Quick Answer
There is no formula. Personal-injury case value depends on injury severity, total past and future medical bills, lost wages and lost earning capacity, liability-evidence strength, the at-fault party’s available insurance and assets, and whether the case is being prepared for litigation. Khashayar Law Group’s published results range from a firm-reported $4 million wrongful-death motorcycle settlement to a publicly reported $61.5 million legal-malpractice jury verdict. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
Reviewed by Daryoosh Khashayar, ABOTA Member, founder and managing partner of Khashayar Law Group — Last updated May 2026.
Personal injury case value in California is the sum of two categories of damages: economic damages (medical bills, lost income, future care, household services, property damage) and non-economic damages (pain and suffering, emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of life, loss of consortium). In cases involving oppression, fraud, or malice — including drunk driving and intentional harm — California Civil Code §3294 allows punitive damages on top.
Five factors generally influence personal-injury valuation: (1) injury severity and permanence, (2) total documented medical expenses and reasonable projected future care, (3) lost wages and lost earning capacity, (4) the strength of liability evidence under California’s pure comparative negligence rule (Civil Code §1714), and (5) the depth of available insurance coverage and defendant assets. Outcomes vary widely — the same injury can produce very different recoveries depending on how those factors stack up in a given case.
The single largest predictor of case value is whether the attorney across the table from the defendant’s insurer will actually take the case to trial. Daryoosh Khashayar is a member of the American Board of Trial Advocates (ABOTA), a credential that requires verified jury trial experience and judicial recommendations. Insurance carriers rate every claim partly on that trial readiness. The firm’s case results include a publicly reported $61.5 million jury verdict, a firm-reported $5 million truck-accident settlement, and a firm-reported $4.9 million auto-accident settlement.
Economic damages are the documentable, out-of-pocket losses caused by the injury. They include:
California has no cap on economic damages outside of medical malpractice cases governed by MICRA (Civil Code §3333.2).
California allows non-economic damages for pain and suffering, emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of life, scarring and disfigurement, loss of consortium, and the inability to engage in activities you previously enjoyed. There is no statutory formula. Juries are instructed to award what they determine is reasonable based on the evidence.
Defense insurers commonly try to use a “multiplier” (typically 1.5x to 5x the economic damages) to suggest a range. That is a negotiation tactic, not a legal rule. Severe injuries with permanent disability frequently produce non-economic damages many times the economic component. The single category capped in California is medical malpractice non-economic damages under MICRA.
Punitive damages are available under California Civil Code §3294 when the defendant’s conduct involved oppression, fraud, or malice. Common situations:
Punitive damages must be supported by clear and convincing evidence and bear a reasonable relationship to the compensatory damages. The U.S. Supreme Court has effectively capped most punitive awards at 9-10 times the compensatory damages.
Trial preparation can improve negotiating posture. Defense counsel and insurance carriers often consider whether opposing counsel is prepared to litigate if settlement negotiations fail, although outcomes vary by case, venue, defendants, insurance coverage, and facts. Daryoosh Khashayar’s publicly reported $61.5 million jury verdict is one example of complex civil-litigation jury-trial experience. It is not a personal-injury or wrongful-death verdict, and it should be considered as evidence of courtroom capability in high-damages litigation rather than as a guarantee of any particular result in a different practice area.
This FAQ relates to our Automobile Accidents, Truck Accidents, Wrongful Death, and Medical Malpractice practice areas. For a free case valuation, call (858) 509-1550.
Legal review note. This FAQ was reviewed for general California personal-injury procedure and is current as of May 2026. Statutes, insurance requirements, and case law can change. This article is general information, not legal advice.
Case results disclosure. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Verdicts, judgments, and settlements depend on the facts, defendants, insurance coverage, injuries, evidence, venue, and applicable law. Some settlement results listed are firm-reported because settlement terms may be confidential. The $61,587,000 legal-malpractice / patent-negligence result is a publicly reported verdict, relevant to complex civil-litigation experience rather than a particular injury practice. The Brownlee trip-and-fall / TBI matter against the City of San Diego is a public-entity serious-injury result, not a wrongful-death result.